MGT672 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric - Module 2 Exceeds Expectation Content, Research, and Analysis 21-25 Points Requirements Exceeds Expectation Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 21-25 Points Content Exceeds Expectation Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions. 25-30 Points Analysis Exceeds Expectation Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of the Six Steps of Decision Making Framework, concepts and applications. 13-15 Points Sources Exceeds Expectation Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence 16-20 Points Meets Expectation - Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 11-15 Points Below Expectation - Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6-10 Points Limited Evidence Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 16-20 Points Meets Expectation - Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions. 11-15 Points Below Expectation - Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions. 6-10 Points Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions. 19-24 Points Meets Expectation - Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of the Six Steps of Decision Making Framework, concepts and applications. 10-12 Points Meets Expectation - Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 13-18 Points Below Expectation - Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of the Six Steps of Decision Making Framework, concepts and applications. 7-12 Points Limited Evidence Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of the Six Steps of Decision Making Framework, concepts and applications. 7-9 Points Below Expectation - Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 4-6 Points Limited Evidence Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. MGT672 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric - Module 2 Mechanics and Writing Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style. 5 Points Exceeds Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references. Total points possible = 100 4 Points Meets Expectation - Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references. 3 Points Below Expectation - Project is poorly organized and written, and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development, and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references. 1-2 Points Limited Evidence Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, APA style, and APA citations and references.
Purchase answer to see full attachment