Post a link and short summary of a research article which would inform the implementation of spirituality in your practice.

Write a paper (1,250-1,750 words) describing the approach to care of cancer. In addition, include the following in your paper:Describe the diagnosis and staging of cancer.Describe at least three complications of cancer, the side effects of treatment, and methods to lessen physical and psychological effects.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.Approach to Care Rubric 1Unsatisfactory 0-72%0.00%2Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%75.00%3Satisfactory 76-79%79.00%4Good 80-89%89.00%5Excellent 90-100%100.00%80.0 %Content 30.0 %Explanation of the Diagnosis and Staging of Cancers is Provided.An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is not provided.An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided but is missing relevant information.An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that meets the assignment criteria.An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that is offered in a detailed manner.An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that is offered in a detailed manner, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking.20.0 %At Least Three Complications of Cancer are Identified With Comprehensive Discussion of Available Treatments.Less than three complications of cancer are identified.At least three complications of cancer are identified but lacking a comprehensive discussion of available treatments.At least three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments.More than three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments.More than three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking.30.0 %Provides Recommendations to Address Physiological and Psychological Side Effects of Care.Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are lacking.Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are missing relevant information.Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care meet the assignment criteria.Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are offered in a detailed manner.Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are offered in a detailed manner, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.5.0 %Paragraph Development and TransitionsParagraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.5.0 %Format 2.0 %Paper Format (1- inch margins; 12-point-font; double-spaced; Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)No reference page is included. No citations are used.Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct.In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.100 %Total Weightage

Subjective, objective, assessment, and plan (SOAP) notes serve as a method of documenting the clinical encounter between the provider (you) and the patient. SOAP notes are used to document the patient's subjective data (chief complaint, history of present illness [HPI], and review of systems [ROS]), objective data (vital signs and measurements, physical exam findings, and results from diagnostic testing already completed), assessment (medical diagnosis(es) and differentials), and plan (interventions you will do to treat the patient).For the purpose of this course, all SOAP notes will include a comprehensive patient history. The physical exam will be determined by the purpose of the exam. An episodic SOAP note includes only those portions of the SOAP that are specific to the chief complaint. For instance, if a patient presents with an eye infection, you would include the chief complaint and any pertinent medical history of the complaint. The ROS would include anything that is pertinent to the complaint. The exam will include the head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat (HEENT) and any other pertinent systems. The assessment and plan should be focused on the acute issue. For systems not used on the form, you may use n/a. Please do not copy and paste your ROS and PE from other resources. Do not document systems that were not examined. Episodic visits generally do not require vaccines and assessment tools. Prudent practitioners make a habit of always documenting a full set of vital signs and a respiratory and cardiovascular exam.If the patient visit is for the purpose of a well-child visit or a PE, you would be expected to document a comprehensive patient history as well as a comprehensive ROS and PE. This would address all systems. Do not use terms such as "normal". For instance, do not say "Heart-normal". Document - "Heart is RRR with S1, S2 -murmurs, rubs or gallops". We want to know that you know what "normal" represents.Please be sure to include these tips in your Soap notes-Here are some tips regarding the SOAP notes:1. The ROS needs to be completely filled out. You cannot say Denies issues or problems. What issues/problems? You need to write out symptoms.Denies sore throat, denies cough, denies wheezing, etc. etc.Remember this is only what is reported or denied, not what you observe or examine.2. The PE under the objective section is what you observe and examine.You cannot say "normal". What is normal? Describe what you saw, heard, felt.Lungs CTA. TM pearly grey. Heart S1, S2. BS x 4 quadrants etc etc. 3. You need to include a completed growth chart with EACH SOAP note, do not submit blank growth charts.4. You need 3 dx EACH week, 1 primary and 2 differentials with ICD- 10 codes for all three. Indicate which dx is your primary and which are your differentials. You need to provide a rationale for each of the diagnoses.5. Your references must be evidenced based and no older than 2012. You must provide an intext citation within the body of your note to show where your reference applies. This needs to go along with the assessment and the plan section.