Environmental Controversy Science and Politics Discussion

User Generated

nezlobev19

Humanities

Description

Background Information

Today there are many complaints over the politicization of science. Many people believe politics should not play a role in science, but once government funds science, the funding decisions become political. In most social institutions, disagreements are settled by debate. Science in contrast, uses experiments to prove or disprove theories. Science is testable, and is self-proving. If a better explanation for a phenomenon is found, it will replace other explanations. This is why careful distinctions must be made between Frontier Science, Consensus Science, and Junk Science.

Many difficult controversies surround the environmental problems we face in the world today. Problems include: Air and water pollution, global warming, species and ecosystem biodiversity, energy, hazardous waste, population, and food supply issues. Politics control the financing of scientific research and development to help solve these issues. In politics passion wins over logic.

Science is not politics and cannot be debated in the same way politics are. Mixing politics with science produces bad science. Government efforts to fund research interfere with the maintenance of high scientific standards. The current Congress consists of 535 members. Of these members, 7 (1.3%), are scientists, and 21 others are healthcare professionals.

ReferencesReferences

Use these references along with resources from your own research to help answer the questions that follow.

Lamb, G. M. (2005). Science and politics: a dangerous mix. Christian Science Monitor, 97(213), 11. Retrieved from MasterFILE Premier database.
Link to article
Pielke Jr., R. A. (2006). When Scientists Politicize Science. Regulation, 29(1), 28–34. Retrieved from EBSCO MegaFILE database.
Link to article

Questions

Do you feel that scientists should be cut out of the policy making process, particularly on environmental issues, when their research is proven and widely accepted and is being ignored and disputed? Politicians ultimately make the decisions, but shouldn't the scientists have a voice?

Do you feel that lobbyists and special interest groups exert too great of an influence and act as an impediment to finding solutions to, and providing the funding for, research for the environmental problems we face?

Explanation & Answer:
2 pages
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

HiKindly see the attached completed assignment and let me know in case you have any questions. If not, feel free to come back with more assignments and I will be glad to help.Good bye

Running head: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND P0LITICS ESSAY

Environmental Science and Politics
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation

1

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLITICS

2

Environmental Science and Politics
Abstract
This paper is an essay response to a classic example of a conflict, controversy or mix-up between
science and politics. It will discuss the sidelining of scientists during policy-making, specifically
on the matter of the environment even though their research conclusions are well proven and
accepted. Surprisingly, scientists' propositions on environmental issues have been ignored and
disputed. Politicians are primed to make a fundamental decision, but a scientist should have a
well-pronounced vo...


Anonymous
Super useful! Studypool never disappoints.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4