understanding and application of knowledge in the field of program management strategy, research paper, management homework help
Research Paper
The final assignment for this course is a Research Paper. The purpose of
the Research Paper is for you to culminate the learning achieved in the
course by describing your understanding and application of knowledge in
the field of program management strategy. The Research Paper represents 23% of the overall course grade.
Focus of the Research Paper
This final research paper must demonstrate the understanding of new
learning in the field of project management and how it relates to the
Project Management Maturity Model. This is an assignment with a length
of 10- to 15- pages (not including title and reference pages) that
should integrate the reading, multi-media and class discussion boards.
It is mandatory to have research from the classroom text, as well as at
least 4 sources from the internet or online library to support your
views. A minimum of 2 of these sources must be from the Ashford Online
Library.
Consider the validity of your resources carefully before using them in
academic papers. It is recommended to use examples from your
professional experience where possible, or build from your learning in
the discussion boards. Use at least one project you have been a team
member or a project manager as an example to discuss each of the
following topics:
The definition of the Project Management Maturity Model and how
organizations can increase their overall productivity using the model.
The importance of organizational strategy and how project management needs to link to objectives to achieve results.
Project communication methods including who the stakeholders are and why they are important to the project manager.
The use of project quality, including earned value analysis, and examples of successful and troubled projects.
A conclusion to describe how the probability of success can be
found with an organization that is able to reach maturity in terms of
project management.
Writing the Research PaperThe Research Paper:
Must be ten to fifteen double-spaced pages in length, and
formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing
Center.
Must include a title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
Must use at least five scholarly sources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford Online Library.
Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.______________________________________________________________________________________
Description:
Total Possible Score: 23.00
Organization: Introduction, Thesis Statement, and Conclusion
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Paper is logically organized with a well-written
introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. The conclusion
thoroughly and comprehensively describes how the probability of success
can be found with an organization that is able to reach maturity in
terms of project management.
Proficient - Paper is logically organized with an introduction, thesis
statement, and conclusion. One of these requires improvement. The
conclusion describes how the probability of success can be found with an
organization that is able to reach maturity in terms of project
management.
Basic - Paper is organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and
conclusion. One or more of these components requires improvement. The
conclusion somewhat describes how the probability of success can be
found with an organization that is able to reach maturity in terms of
project management, but necessary details have been omitted.
Below Expectations - Paper is loosely organized with an introduction,
thesis statement, and conclusion. The introduction, thesis statement,
and/or conclusion require much improvement. The conclusion fails to
describe how the probability of success can be found with an
organization that is able to reach maturity in terms of project
management.
Non-Performance - The introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion
are either non-existent or lack the components described in the
assignment instructions.
Organizations Using PMMM
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly defines PMMM and comprehensively explains
how organizations can increase their overall productivity using the
model.
Proficient - Sufficiently defines PMMM and explains how organizations can increase their overall productivity using the model.
Basic - Briefly defines PMMM and explains how organizations can increase their overall productivity using the model.
Below Expectations - Fails to define PMMM and explain how organizations
can increase their overall productivity using the model.
Non-Performance - The definition of PMMM and the explanation of how
organizations can increase their overall productivity using the model is
either non-existent or lack the components described in the assignment
instructions.
Importance of Organizational Strategy
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Exceptionally clear and focused explanation of the
importance of organizational strategy and how project management needs
to link to objectives to achieve results.
Proficient - Clear and focused explanation of the importance of
organizational strategy and how project management needs to link to
objectives to achieve results; however, details are missing from the
explanation.
Basic - Somewhat clear and focused explanation of the importance of
organizational strategy and how project management needs to link to
objectives to achieve results; however, multiple relevant details are
missing from the explanation.
Below Expectations - Lacks clarity and focus in the explanation of the
importance of organizational strategy and how project management needs
to link to objectives to achieve results.
Non-Performance - The explanation of the importance of organizational
strategy and how project management needs to link to objectives to
achieve results is either non-existent or lacks the components described
in the assignment instructions.
Project Communication Methods
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Provides a thorough and comprehensive discussion of
project communication methods. Stakeholders are described in detail and
elaboration on why they are important to the project manager is
provided in great depth.
Proficient - Provides an effective discussion of project communication
methods. Stakeholders are described, as well as why they are important
to the project manager.
Basic - Provides a brief discussion of project communication methods.
Stakeholders are identified, but not described fully, and/or why they
are important to the project manager is included, but lacks detail.
Below Expectations - Attempts to provide a discussion of project
communication methods. Stakeholders are not described, and/or why they
are important to the project manager is not included.
Non-Performance - The discussion of project communication methods is
either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment
instructions.
Project Quality and Earned Value Analysis
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Provides a comprehensive and insightful synthesis of
the use of project quality, including earned value analysis, and
examples of successful and troubled projects. The synthesis is
supported by significant research.
Proficient - Provides a comprehensive synthesis of the
use of project quality, including earned value analysis, and examples of
successful and troubled projects. Some relevant details needed to show
full understanding of the issues are missing from the assignment.
Basic - Provides a limited synthesis of the use of project quality,
including earned value analysis, and examples of successful and troubled
projects. Minimal research is used to support the synthesis.
Below Expectations - Provides a vague synthesis of the use of project
quality, including earned value analysis, and examples of successful and
troubled projects. The synthesis is not supported by research or is
not appropriately supported.
Non-Performance - The synthesis of the use of project quality,
including earned value analysis, and examples of successful and troubled
projects is either non-existent or lacks the components described in
the assignment instructions.
Reading: Analysis
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Appraises tactics for relating ideas, text structure,
or other textual features in order to gain knowledge or insight within
and across texts and disciplines.
Proficient - Recognizes connections among ideas, text structure, or
other textual features, to analyze how they support a sophisticated
understanding of the text as a whole.
Basic - Recognizes the connections among portions of a text in
considering how these contribute to a fundamental understanding of the
text as a whole.
Below Expectations - Makes an effort to recognize portions of a text as needed to respond to inquiries posed in the assignment.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the
issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary
for full understanding.
Proficient - Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered,
delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.
Basic - Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.
Below Expectations - Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but
may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic
understanding.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of
syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work
contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.
Proficient -Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and
mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a
few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as
spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may
slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or
mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major
errors, which distract the reader.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
APA Formatting
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title and reference page.
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper; however, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic - Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. Layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA
formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to
distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Page Requirement
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.
Proficient - The paper closely meets the page requirements predetermined in the assignment description.
Basic - The paper meets over half of the page requirement.
Below Expectations - A fraction of the page requirement is completed.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Resource Requirement
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Provides ample resources and uses the correct amount of sources from the specified search agent.
Proficient - Provides the approximate number of sources, while using
some of the correct search agents specified in the assignment
instructions.
Basic - Provides over half of the sources required in the assignment instructions.
Below Expectations - Barely provides adequate resources and unable to include sources from specified search agent.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Europe(Continental)