To drill or not to drill in ANWR (PUT YOUR TITLE HERE) Aisling Kane (YOUR NAME) Rasmussen College Author’s Note: The purpose of this paper is to discuss the two-sided debate of drilling in the Arctic wildlife refuge. (YOUR TITLE) Written for Instructor Aisling Kane, on the date July 17, 2017 (your date) course G328, Human Uses of the Environment. Running title: final project Title of your research (i.e Global warming: Fact or fiction) The Controversy (please keep this heading for rough draft and final) : Identify the controversy Go into detail on what the two sides are and what you plan to research (minimum one page you can remove this part once you have your one page minimum) Yellow HIGH light part can be removed once you have your research and information The Major Players (please keep this heading for rough draft and final) 2 Running title: final project 3 (minimum one page) • Who is involved? Why are they involved? • Go into detail on all the players involved in both sides of this debate Yellow HIGH light part can be removed once you have your research and information Important Facts: • (minimum one page) Running title: final project • 4 State relevant facts concerning the issue. Try to separate fact from opinion. Try not to show your own bias. Properly use APA citations Yellow HIGH light part can be removed once you have your research and information Side One: (please keep this heading for rough draft and final) Running title: final project • • 5 (minimum one page) Arguments; state briefly and cite your sources Yellow HIGH light part can be removed once you have your research and information Side Two: ((please keep this heading for rough draft and final)) Running title: final project • Arguments; state briefly and cite your sources HIGH lighted part can be removed once you have your research and information • Your Opinion and Rationale (please keep this heading for rough draft and final)) (minimum one page) • • I believe that..., We should..., I feel that... Use supporting arguments and rationale. What arguments would you use to present to those who disagree with you? Cite all of your sources. 6 Running title: final project • 7 This is where you can tell me which side you agree with and why HIGH lighted part can be removed once you have your research and information References: • Alphabetize your sources. Make sure there are sources representing both sides of the issue. Your references must match your intext citations Examples of how I want your references done Running title: final project 8 Lamb, G. (2005, September 27). Science and politics: a dangerous mix. Christian Science Monitor, 97(213), 11-13. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from Academic Search Premier database. Link to article Pielke Jr., R. (2006, Spring2006). When Scientists Politicize Science. Regulation, 29(1), 28-34. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from Business Source Complete database. Link to article Author last name is always first (this is how they are put in order) Date of publication Name of article and publication DATE IT WAS RETRIEVED BY YOU From where it was retrieved and the link
Purchase answer to see full attachment