Part 1 one page and APA Reference As noted in the reading for this module, some states have implemented mandatory arrest policies for domestic violence. Since the implementation of these policies there has been an increase in dual arrest. This has created additional challenges.Please read the article "She Hit Me, Too. Identifying the Primary Aggressor: A Prosecutor's Perspective" by Gael Strack. Rasmussen College gratefully acknowledges the National Family Justice Center Alliance and Gael Strack for allowing us to reproduce this article.Then consider this scenario:Bob and Sue have been married for 10 years and had 3 children together: ages 7, 5, and 2. Bob struggles to maintain employment due to his alcohol addiction. Sue is a paraprofessional at her two children's elementary school. Bob has been arrested three times for domestic violence. Last night their 7-year-old daughter called 9-1-1 and reported that her mom and dad were fighting. When the police arrived, Bob admitted to putting his hands around Sue's neck. Sue was very angry when the police arrived and said that she punched Bob in the throat.Your initial post should discuss what factors (outlined in the article) are most important to consider in this scenario. Include why you chose these factors. Then, put yourself in the role of the police officer. The post should also include three questions you believe should be asked of each party and what information you are hoping to gain from these questions. Finally, as the police officer, what will you do in in this case?Your response post should be to a person who asked different questions than you or had a different response as the police officer. Compare and contrast your responses.Part 2: one page and APA Reference In a two paragraph response, complete the discussion question(s) as directed. Additionally, respond to another student who may have a different viewpoint or idea than you. Compare and contrast your answers.Read the following article;Crime and Substance AbuseSecond, review the scenario below. Consider the above article, as well as information obtained in this module’s online lecture. Describe some of the items you would be searching for and the suspected crimes they item may be related to.Scenario: You are assisting an investigator in your department who has drafted a search warrant for a motor vehicle. The vehicle was stopped and methamphetamine was discovered inside the vehicle. The driver was arrested and jailed on possession of a controlled substance. During the search, brown powder and syringes are located. You discover several, small plastic baggie corners torn off with a trace amount of an off-white substance. In addition, numerous items of unopen mail is discovered inside the glove compartment. The names on the mail do not match the driver’s name. You also locate several items of jewelry, garage door openers, small power tools, check stock (blank check paper), a crow bar, walkie-talkies, GPS units and cash. Numerous lottery scratch off (non-winners) are in the vehicle.What do you suspect these items are associated with? Based on your suspicions, what else would you be looking for? What safety precautions would you take while searching this vehicle? (Explain what/why these items have a correlation to drug activity).

Word requirement: 300 words min. (150 words min PART A and 150 words min PART B) PLAGIARISM WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED! Please write mostly in your own words.There are TWO PARTS to this assignment. Be sure you complete both PART A and PART B. Label each short essay accordingly and submit in one single post. PART A: State of North Carolina v. Robertson (2000): Larceny or Robbery?a. Read the court case State of North Carolina v. Willie Herbert Robertson (located in the comments). b. Review the following North Carolina statutes.Common Law Robbery (NCGS 14-87), Assault with a Deadly Weapon with Intent to Kill Inflicting Serious Injury (NCGS 14-32(b)), Felonious Larceny (from the person) (NCGS 14-72(b)(1)).c. Answer the following questions in one essay (min 150 words);What crimes was Robertson initially charged with and why?Based on the facts of the case, do you feel that the court ruled correctly in not allowing an imperfect defense of Voluntary Intoxication for either of the two original charges? Why or why not?Why is understanding the distinction between Common Law Robbery and Felonious Larceny important in this case? Based on what you have read, do you feel that the level of force was enough to qualify for the charge of Common Law Robbery? Or did the court rule correctly in choosing the lesser charge on appeal? Explain your reasoning based on the elements for these crimes.What would have had to occur in this scenario in order for you to change your mind and choose the other charge? Explain.PART B: Larceny of a Motor Vehicle in North Carolinaa. Read the UNC School of Government blog post North Carolina Criminal Law: Larceny of a Motor Vehicle (located in the comments).b. Review the North Carolina statute on Larceny (NCGS 14-72) and any other relevant statute discussed in the post.c. Answer the following questions in one essay (min 150 words);In your opinion, should there be a specific statute for Motor Vehicle Theft in North Carolina? Why or why not?If such a statute was created, what would it look like? In other words, what elements would, or should be included in such a statute?With our current penal code, theft of a motor vehicle worth less than $1000 is a misdemeanor offense while theft of one worth $1000 or more is a felony offense. Do you think this is fair? Why or why not?Should the penalties be different for motor vehicles than for other types of stolen merchandise or items? Explain.Do you feel that North Carolina should have a specific statute for carjacking? Or should this crime be charged as it is currently under the Armed Robbery or Common Law Robbery statutes? Discuss your answer.6. Once again, be sure you have completed both PART A and PART B (150 words min each). Label each short essay and place both in the same post/document on the Discussion Board. You do not need to restate the questions.

Strict liability crimes eliminate the need for a particular mens rea. An example of a strict liability crime is statutory rape. If a person over 18 has sexual relations with a person under 18, it doesn't matter that they didn't know their partner was under 18. There is no "knowing" requirement, or even a reckless or negligent requirement. In fact, the defendant could prove that they checked the ID of the partner and it said they were 19 and it looked real. Maybe it was real, and the birthdate was wrong! Even that doesn't negate the fact that they are guilty under the law. They don't have to know the age of their partner. If they are under 18, then they are guilty of statutory rape. Watch the video posted for this week about using strict liability to prosecute herion dealers. The law in their state takes away the "intent to kill" in prosecutions of drug dealers. If they deal herion, even if they don't do it with the intent to kill, they can be prosecuted for 1st degree murder. So let's talk about these laws. Is it fair to prosecute a drug dealer for murder if all they did was sell the drugs and had no intent to kill? What about statutory rape? Why have these laws been passed with strict liability? Find an example of a case in the news where a person was prosecuted and convicted of statutory rape? What was their sentence?